Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: A Good Battle | Sprite Tech

kind of Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: A Good Battle will cowl the newest and most present help on the world. proper to make use of slowly so that you perceive competently and accurately. will addition your data proficiently and reliably

When you’re on the lookout for an final Wi-Fi 6E router, this Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300 will allow you to out.

Since late 2022, these two have been the very best standalone Quad-bad Wi-Fi machines representing the 2 well-liked community suppliers.

Contemplating that Wi-Fi 7 is correct across the nook, they’re prone to stay the cream of the crop by their Wi-Fi 6E requirements. And which means they’re going to keep related for years to come back.

That being stated, choosing one out of this pair may be difficult. This publish will push you in the fitting path, however the detailed overview of every router will present extra data. Give them an excellent learn.

You can rotate the eight non-removable antennas of the TP-Link AXE300 360 degrees, but you cannot pull them out.
Asus GT-AXE1600 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: Each routers are big sq. packing containers.

Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: two (virtually) equally wonderful routers

The Asus GT-AXE1600 and the TP-Hyperlink AXE300 have lots in frequent.

Each are huge Wi-Fi 6E routers with eight non-removable exterior antennas. Each have three Multi-Gig ports, excessive processing energy, and top-tier Wi-Fi specs. And each include a strong net person interface and a helpful non-compulsory cell app.

With that, let us take a look at its {hardware} specs.

Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: {Hardware} Specs

Mannequin Asus GT-AXE16000 TP-Hyperlink AXE300
Wi-Fi Bandwidth Quad band
Quad band
4×4 AX: As much as 1148Mbps
4×4 AX: As much as 1148Mbps
4×4 Wi-Fi 6
As much as 4804Mbps
4×4 Wi-Fi 6
As much as 4804Mbps
4×4 Wi-Fi 6
As much as 4804Mbps
4×4 Wi-Fi 6
As much as 4804Mbps
4×4 WIFI 6E
As much as 4804Mbps
4×4 WIFI 6E
As much as 4804Mbps
Compatibility with earlier variations 802.11a/b/g/n/ac 802.11a/b/g/n/ac
wi-fi safety WPA/WPA2/WPA3 WPA/WPA2/WPA3
Operation roles Router (default)
Entry level
AiMesh node (router or satellite tv for pc)
media bridge
Router (default)
Entry level
mesh prepared Sure
(one mesh)
Gigabit community port 4x LAN 4x LAN
Multi-gigabit community port 1 2.5Gbps WAN/LAN
2 10Gbps LANs/WANs
1 LAN/2.5 Gbps multi-gigabit LAN
1 10 Gbps multi-gigabit LAN/WAN
1 × 10 Gbps Multigigabit/SFP+ Combo WAN/LAN
LAN Hyperlink Aggregation Sure
(LAN ports 1 and a couple of)
LAN solely
(LAN2 + LAN3)
WAN Hyperlink Aggregation Sure (WAN+LAN4) Not
Twin WAN Sure (WAN + USB
or some other LAN port)
USB 1x USB 3.0
1x USB2.0
1x USB 3.0
net person interface Sure Sure
Dynamic DNS
with distant entry
Sure Sure
Cell app Asus router
(non-compulsory login account)
TP-Hyperlink connection
(account login required)
processing energy 2.0GHz quad-core CPU,
256MB Flash, 2GB RAM
2.0GHz quad-core CPU,
1 GB RAM, 256 MB flash reminiscence
Plug 100-240V 100-240V
Vitality consumption
(greater than 24 hours)
≈ 475Wh ≈ 465Wh
antennas 8x exterior 8x exterior
Dimensions 10.4 x 10.4 x 2.9 inches
(26.4 x 26.4 x 7.4cm)
9.1 × 9.1 × 2.7 inches
(232 × 232 × 68mm)
Weight 5.3 lbs (2.4 kg) 3.75 kilos (1.7 kg)
firmware model
(in Evaluate) 1.0.3 Construct 20220907
Launch date June 2022 October 2022
US worth
(at launch)
$699 $599.99
Asus GT-AXE1600 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: {hardware} specs

Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: The variations

Regardless of the same {hardware} specs, the 2 have main variations.

To begin with, TP-Hyperlink Archer AXE300 uniquely incorporates a 10Gbps Multi-Gig/SFP+ combo LAN/WA port: it could possibly work in any approach and based mostly on WAN or LAN. This makes it extra versatile when it comes to system compatibility.

For instance, you need to use it with an SFP+ Fiber-topic ONT or host an SFP+ NAS server. On this case, the Asus GT-AXE16000 would require a converter, which isn’t a good suggestion.

However, the Asus proved to be a way more versatile router than:

  • helps aggregation on each the WAN facet and the LAN facet.
  • It options Twin-WAN with extraordinarily versatile community port configurations.
  • it has all of the operational capabilities out there to a router (entry level, repeater, media bridge, and so on.).

On prime of that, whereas each are mesh-ready, Asus’ AiMesh is much superior to TP-Hyperlink’s OneMesh.

Consequently, the GT-AXE16000 could be a sturdy member of the Multi-Gigabit mesh. In contrast, the Archer AXE300 can solely drive some low-end extenders, and for now, there is not any risk of wired mesh backhauling.

Asus GT-AXE16000 quad-band Wi-Fi 6E router portsTP Link Archer AXE300 Multigigabit Ports
Asus GT-AXE1600 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: The latter is extra fascinating within the community ports division, with the Multi-Gig/SFP+ combo.

Lastly, the Asus USB ports can deal with rather more community storage and different USB-based functions than the TP-Hyperlink counterpart. That is at all times an excellent factor for these seeking to get probably the most out of their buy.

Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: Total Rating and Efficiency


Highly effective {hardware}, quad-band with Wi-Fi 6E assist, three multi-gigabit ports (one 2.5 Gbps and two 10 Gbps)

Stellar efficiency all through

Wonderful set of gaming-related on-line monitoring and safety options, full AiMesh 2.0 compatibility

Unmatched port flexibility, together with WAN, dual-WAN, and LAN/WAN hot-swappable hyperlink aggregations

Lovely ROG Aura lighting


Costly 10Gbps port sustained charges and NAS efficiency (when internet hosting a storage system) may very well be higher

Awkward backhaul band design in an AiMesh wi-fi setup, no UNII4 (5.9 GHz) assist, no SFP+

Cumbersome, non-wall-mountable design

Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Link AXE300 Multi-Gig Wired, Wi-Fi and NAS performance (when hosting a USB portable SSD)
Asus GT-AXE16000 vs. TP-Hyperlink AXE300: Sustained multi-gigabit efficiency with wired, Wi-Fi and NAS (when internet hosting USB transportable SSD).


Prime-tier {hardware} with wonderful efficiency; three versatile Multi-Gig ports and LAN Hyperlink Aggregation assist

Sturdy net person interface; a lot of Wi-Fi and community settings and a handful of priceless options for dwelling customers

Comparatively cheaper than opponents

Wall mountable; helpful non-compulsory cell app; OneMesh-ready


No choice for Gigabit WAN, Twin-WAN, or quick mesh with wired backhauling

HomeShield Professional requires a subscription, cell app, and account login

Cumbersome design, USB port efficiency may very well be higher

Asus GT-AXE1600 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: which one to purchase

When you’re on the lookout for a standalone router for a demanding dwelling, both one will likely be a wonderful alternative. Every offers you true multi-gigabit wired efficiency and the very best Wi-Fi efficiency on all out there bands.

Of the 2, the TP-Hyperlink AXE300 is the one one which has built-in assist for SFP+. When you want this port, it is the good choice – you will not should resort to a swap.

Asus GT AXE16000 Smart LightWhen in action, the TP-Link Archer AXE300's overhead lighting is relatively modest.
Asus GT-AXE1600 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300 – The previous has a flowery RGB programmable gaming gentle, whereas the latter is a bit mundane on this entrance.

Nonetheless, if you wish to lengthen Wi-Fi protection later and have a lot of the options, together with these associated to video games, with out paying extra, or if you wish to get the very best USB-based functions, the Asus GT-AXE16000 is the one to decide on.

Whether or not the Asus extras are definitely worth the larger worth is as much as you. Different Wi-Fi answer pairings can be found right here.

I want the article almost Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: A Good Battle provides keenness to you and is beneficial for adjunct to your data

Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Link AXE300: A Good Fight